Anne Hathaway to play Selina Kyle; Tom Hardy will be Bane in 'The Dark Knight Rises'

Batman fans, this is a big one. Warner Bros. and Christopher Nolan announced today that Anna Hathaway will be portraying Selina Kyle (and, presumably, her alter-ago, Catwoman) in the Nolan-directed The Dark Knight Rises, due in theaters on July 20th, 2012. Nolan also revealed Inception scene-stealer Tom Hardy’s role in the new film: he’ll be playing the villainous Bane.

I’m absolutely stunned by this news. I had been assuming, for one reason or another, that Catwoman was not being considered as a potential character in The Dark Knight Rises. I figured we’d have heard something. Then, I remembered: Christopher Nolan is the king of film secrecy. We can speculate all we want on the Riddler and Talia al Ghul and Vicki Vale, but chances are we’re totally off. Today proved that.

After the initial shock and surprise, I was very happy with the news. Nolan had already told us that the Riddler would not be in the movie, a revelation I was very happy to hear (he’s too similar to the Joker). However, after hearing rumors of Jessica Biel, Eva Green and Keira Knightley being considered for roles like Talia al Ghul and Vicki Vale, I suddenly wished we’d hear some more rumors about Johnny Depp playing the Riddler. This would be a safe, marketable choice.

Hathaway’s Catwoman might not be as marketable as Depp as the Riddler, but it’s arguably the next-best choice, at least where finances are concerned. Most of the members of Batman’s Rogues Gallery (at least the ones who lend themselves to Nolan’s style) have been seen in the recent films already. Catwoman is a very recognizable character, and I think we’ve had enough time to recover from 2004’s horrendously campy Catwoman, in which Halle Berry delivered a Razzie-winning performance in the titular role. Hathaway is also a very marketable star and a talented actress, too. She was nominated for the Best Actress Oscar for her work in the 2008 film Rachel Getting Married.


Tom Hardy playing Bane is huge news as well. For those who don’t know, Bane is a villain created for the “Knightfall” story arc back in 1993. An orphan born in a Central American prison, Bane was forced by a corrupt government to serve out a sentence in place of his father, a revolutionary who escaped the court system. Bane was given a classical education in prison, and developed astonishing physical abilities as well. He eventually became a test subject for a drug called “Venom”, which even further enhanced his physical power.

There’s a quick rundown of Bane, courtesy of his Wikipedia page. Hardy should be perfect in the role, even though he’s British and Bane is usually portrayed as Hispanic. Hardy did a wonderful job playing a prisoner in Bronson; that should transfer over quite well here.

Bane is not a very well-known character, which is fine; Catwoman is plenty recognizable. He was, however, the instigator of a very pivotal moment in the Batman canon: he broke Batman’s back, as pictured above. To me, it would only make sense to feature this in the film. Bane is often thought of as the first villain to truly best the Batman; it would be logical to have this moment in the third film, but who knows if it’ll be in there.

Another interesting tidbit: according to the Wikipedia page, Bane operated in Gotham City during a time in which fear ruled; specifically, fear of Batman. Considering the ending of The Dark Knight, that doesn’t sound too far-fetched for Rises. Interestingly, Bane caught the attention of the League of Assassins (the League of Shadows in Batman Begins) and Ra’s al Ghul following the Knightfall arc. Ra’s al Ghul died in Batman Begins, but his comic book counterpart has a penchant for coming back from the dead. This seems a little outlandish for a Nolan-directed Batman film, but it could be a lead-in for Talia al Ghul, who hasn’t been ruled out yet as a possible player in The Dark Knight Rises.

For me, this is where the true excitement starts. We’ll probably see some official pics sometime in the next four or five months, and I honestly can’t wait for the inevitable trailer. We have our players, at least a few of them, and now the real speculation can begin.

'Mass Effect 2' Finally Hits the Playstation 3 Tomorrow...

The wait is almost over. After a year of wishing we could play Bioware's excellent Mass Effect 2, Playstation 3 owners can finally pick up their copies tomorrow. And it's being called the definitive version of the game. Watch this space for a review from me in the near future. I cannot wait to play this game.

Marshawn Lynch's 67 yard TD run against the Saints...According to Tecmo

Too bad they can't get the entire offense into the endzone with him like in the actual game. BEAST MODE indeed.

Our First Look at Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker/Spider-Man

I was not initially onboard with the idea of rebooting the Spider-Man franchise so soon after its quality bombed out in 2007 with Spider-Man 3. It just seemed far too soon to reboot the series, even if its third installment sucked so bad. However, director Marc Webb and company have hit all the right notes thus far. The casting has been absolutely spot-on, with The Social Network star Andrew Garfield filling the role of Peter Parker, and Superbad/Zombieland star Emma Stone set to play Gwen Stacy. This by itself is a good sign; Stacy was a fixture in the early comics before Mary-Jane Watson was. Sam Raimi's choice to save Stacy until the third film was not a good one.

Today, we get our first look at Garfield in costume as Spidey. It's a slightly different take on the suit than we saw in Raimi's trilogy, but it's not a radical departure. Most notably, many on the Interwebs today have noticed that Garfield appears to have metal objects on his wrists. After all the webshooter vs. organic web controversy that surrounded the first Spider-Man film, it looks like purists will finally be happy.

My 10 Favorite Movies of 2010

Another year, another great trip to the movies. Here are my top 10 (I guess top 11, I kinda cheated) favorite movies of 2010. Bear in mind, I wasn't able to catch all the movies I wanted to see, which is probably why Black Swan and Blue Valentine aren't on the list. Enjoy!


Honorable Mention: Monsters (Click here to read my review)
With Monsters, director Gareth Edwards proves that a big budget is not a necessity when making a monster movie. I read somewhere that Edwards took his two lead actors (Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able) down to Mexico and Texas to shoot the movie guerilla-style. Though the journey seems a bit too long-winded and drawn-out at times, the environments are what blew my mind here. Edwards filmed portions of Monsters in Texas in the wake of Hurricane Ike, and this use of real-world devastation goes a long way toward creating a convincing and believable monster-ravaged world.


10. Let Me In (Click here to read my review)
Cloverfield director Matt Reeves really surprised me with his remake of the 2009 Swedish vampire masterpiece Let the Right One In. Reeves clearly decided to respect both the literary source material and the film that precedes his own; elements of both are present here. Several improvements on the Swedish original exist in this take on the material, primarily the introduction of Elias Koteas's character. I had fairly low expectations for this movie, admittedly because it's a remake, but those expectations were shattered. This is a wonderful English-language adaptation of the Let the Right One In story, with excellent performances by child actors Chloe Grace Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee.


9. Unstoppable (Click here to read my review)
This was a shocker for me. Tony Scott's movies are often enjoyable, but his affinity for trippy editing usually brings them down quite a few notches in my book. Not so, however, in the case of Unstoppable. Denzel Washington and Chris Pine star as train conductors who go after a runaway locomotive carrying volatile chemicals across Pennsylvania. I've come to believe, following my viewing of Unstoppable, that every awards season needs a film like this as a lead-in. Unstoppable probably won't win any Oscars, but its leads give great performances and the action is well-paced and a joy to behold.


8. 127 Hours (Click here to read my review)
2010 was the year of the one-man show, as evidenced by acclaimed turns by Ryan Reynolds in Buried and James Franco in this gem, directed by Danny Boyle. The director reunites with several big players from his previous effort, the Oscar-sweeping Slumdog Millionaire, to bring to the screen the harrowing story of Aron Ralston. Ralston was forced to amputate his own arm in 2003 when he became trapped under a boulder while hiking in Moab, Utah. Boyle and company deliver a wonderful movie, but it's Franco's memorable turn as Ralston that sets this one apart.


7. The Town (Click here to read my review)
Ben Affleck is quickly proving himself to be a formidable director on the Hollywood scene. His sophomore effort, an adaptation of Chuck Hogan's novel "The Prince of Thieves", focuses on bank robbers in the Charlestown neighborhood of Boston, from which the film takes its title. Affleck plays Doug MacRay, a thief who becomes involved with the manager of a bank he recently robbed. Jeremy Renner plays MacRay's childhood friend, a hot-headed troublemaker with some destructive tendencies. "Mad Men"'s Jon Hamm plays the FBI agent out to catch them. Rebecca Hall, Blake Lively and the late Pete Postlethwaite also give memorable turns. Though we've seen this story quite a few times before (think Heat meets Point Break), it's the powerhouse cast that sets The Town above much of the other heist flicks out there.


6. True Grit (Click here to read my review)
I knew True Grit would be a great film; I just didn't expect it to be as funny as it is. Jeff Bridges plays the legendary Rooster Cogburn, a drunken U.S. Marshall hired by a young girl to bring her father's killer (a hilarious Josh Brolin) to justice. Newcomer Hailee Steinfeld, just 14 years old, plays that young girl, and she manages to hold her own next to her co-stars. Matt Damon also gives a memorable turn as a Texas Ranger who loves to tell people he's a Texas Ranger. A True Grit remake may not have been entirely necessary, but it did make me wish that all remakes could be directed by Joel and Ethan Coen.


5. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Not many people saw Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and that makes me lose a little bit of faith in humanity. Michael Cera may have worn out his welcome in Hollywood a while ago, but he's excellent as the title character in Edgar Wright's third film. Packed full of hilarious pop culture (especially video game) references and characters who break into fights instead of songs, Scott Pilgrim provided some of the best cinematic moments of 2010. Examples: Brandon Routh as a dumb vegan, a scene-stealing Kieran Culkin, all the "Legend of Zelda" shout-outs, "I'm in lesbians with you", etc.


4. Toy Story 3
Hollywood, this is how you do a threequel. Toy Story 3 takes place years after the second installment in the series, and sees Andy getting ready to head off to college. Through the usual series of mix-ups and misunderstandings, Woody, Buzz and their pals end up at Sunnyside Daycare Center, a seemingly fun place ruled by a pink bear who smells like strawberries. Everything is not as it seems at Sunnyside, as the toys soon learn. In this third outing, Pixar delivers a hilarious, emotional, heartfelt and sometimes heart-wrenching final chapter in the Toy Story trilogy, one that made more than a few people cry in their seats. And as with all of Pixar's cinematic offerings, Toy Story 3 has something to offer for all ages. My personal favorite was the Ken doll, voiced perfectly by Michael Keaton.


3. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (Click here to read my review)
Splitting the final chapter in the Harry Potter series into two films was probably a financial move by Warner Bros., but it has also paid off in spades in the creative department thus far. Part 1 never feels rushed, and the three lead actors give their best performances to date. We spend a lot of time in the woods with Harry, Ron and Hermione, but Deathly Hallows: Part 1 also delivers some of the series' best moments. Though fans could still make an argument for Prisoner of Azkaban, I believe Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is the best Harry Potter film to date.


2. The Social Network (Click here to read my review)
David Fincher's masterpiece The Social Network is a very big reminder of how many components must come together to make a great film. Those components came together better than I could've imagined here. It's rare to see a director, a screenwriter, actors, musicians and more mesh so cohesively. Here, we see the film's creative crew, including Fincher, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin, composers Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, and a plethora of perfectly-cast actors, join forces to make a film that I would consider robbed if it didn't win the Best Picture Oscar this year. Sorkin's script may take some heavy creative liberties in its telling of the founding of "The Facebook", a fact that's a little disappointing to me. However, the quality of The Social Network makes me not care so much. This is a well-acted, perfectly-scripted and beautifully-directed piece of cinematic genius that, in many ways, defines the age we live in.

I'll be posting this on Facebook, so go figure.


1. Inception (Click here to read my review)
Would you really expect anything else from me? Christopher Nolan's masterful film isn't perfect, but it was easily the best film experience I had in 2010. Nolan somehow managed to combine James Bond with The Matrix, throwing a little dash of 2001: A Space Odyssey into the action for good measure, and ended up with something awesome. The director created a world in which dream-sharing is possible, and then decided to run with it. Like The Matrix before it, Inception manages to deliver an extremely imaginative world and story while simultaneously giving us landmark action sequences. The spinning hallway is easily my favorite action set-piece in film history.

Nolan's approach to the behind-the-scenes aspects of his films is refreshing, to say the least. Watching the Inception's Blu-ray documentaries, you hear the phrase "in-camera" a lot. The guy likes to actually shoot his films, rather than CG them later. Studying these special features further reveals that Nolan actually built a spinning hallway. He actually caused avalanches. And he didn't shoot in 3D. He's a filmmaker who makes movies the way he knows they should be made, and the results are always stunning. To think that his next film is the third Batman movie makes me more excited than I can type.


Well, there's the list. Please, post your favorite movies of the past year below, I'd love to read them.

Film Review: 'True Grit'

Pleasant surprises at the movie theater are always nice. Having seen a few trailers for the Coen Brothers' adaptation of Charles Portis's novel "True Grit", I assumed the film would be a gritty, hard-hitting Western in the vein of No Country for Old Men. While the Coens' take is definitely darker than Henry Hathaway's 1969 version starring John Wayne, it did manage to surprise me in quite a few ways.

Newcomer Hailee Steinfeld plays 14-year-old Mattie Ross, who hires drunken U.S. Marshall Rooster Cogburn (Jeff Bridges) and Texas Ranger LaBoeuf (Matt Damon) to track down Tom Chaney (Josh Brolin), the man who killed her father.

The big story going into the movie seemed to be Bridges taking the proverbial reins from Wayne. Bridges is wonderful as Rooster Cogburn, but that wasn't what stuck out to me when I watched True Grit. It was Steinfeld's performance that made this movie worth watching. Even as a young actress performing in her first film, Steinfeld holds her own alongside Bridges and Damon. She expertly delivers her dialogue, and seems right at home taking on the challenging role of Mattie Ross. Though she may be receiving "Supporting Actress" nominations from a number of outlets, this is most certainly her movie.

That's not to say Bridges and Damon were disappointments here. In fact, the level of comedy they brought to True Grit was very unexpected for me. This is a laugh-out-loud funny movie. Many of the grittier-looking moments in the trailers were actually comedic in nature. Bridges acts appropriately drunken, and Damon brings a hilarious smugness to LaBoeuf, who certainly takes a great deal of pride in his status as a Texas Ranger. Both also manage to inject some much-needed heart into their characters, and it's from there that True Grit gains much of its depth.

I need to mention Brolin, if only for the reaction he drew from the audience with which I watched True Grit. We only saw one shot of him in the main trailers for the film, and his evil-eye glare made me worry that Tom Chaney would be portrayed as a typical, cliché Old West villain. Suffice to say, he isn't. The same goes for Barry Pepper, the leader of Chaney's gang. He does a wonderful job just the same.

Many have argued that a True Grit remake is an unnecessary endeavor. This is a worthy argument, especially considering the fact that John Wayne won an Oscar for his portrayal of Cogburn. I've heard, however, that the Coens stick far closer to the source material. I watched the tail end of the original True Grit today, and the endings are indeed very, very different.

The fact is, we probably didn't need another True Grit, but the novel is acclaimed enough that a more faithful adaptation is tough to deny. The Coens continue to amaze me with their ability to bring their own style to movies based upon the work of others. This is arguably their most mainstream movie, it being a remake and all, but it's still unarguably their own.

Great true Westerns don't come along very often anymore. I'm happy to say, True Grit marks another return to form for the genre. I hate remakes as much as the next film nerd, but I'll see anything the Coen Brothers put to film. This time, they've given us their own take on a classic Western, and have come up gold. True Grit is a funny, well-acted, beautifully filmed entry into the brothers' filmography, and one that shouldn't be missed.

4.5 stars out of 5

Film Review: 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1'

The Harry Potter film franchise has always stood in the shadow of the book series on which it is based, and it always will. There exists a certain imaginative charm in the books that simply cannot be captured on film. This is no fault of the filmmakers who have attempted to adapt the various books; it's just a difficulty that comes with the territory.

I initially hated Warner Bros.' decision to split the final installment in the series into two movies; it seemed like a financially-driven decision typical of today's Hollywood's corporate players (see: The Twilight Saga). However, I'm happy to say director David Yates and his team took this decision in stride and subsequently made the best Harry Potter film yet.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 sees Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) opting to miss their seventh and final year at Hogwarts so they can pursue and destroy the Horcruxes, which hold the key to Voldemort's power.

I noticed something about halfway through this movie: this is the first time the three leads have been tasked with carrying a movie mostly on their own. The aforementioned Hollywood players behind the Harry Potter franchise have an uncanny knack for casting the who's who of British stage and screen royalty in their movies (I think Liam Neeson might be the only one who's missed out thus far). This time, however, we spend most of our time with Radcliffe, Grint and Watson, and we don't even visit Hogwarts. Fittingly, the three give their best performances to date. Their iconic characters feel like real people, and their chemistry reflects the time the actors have spent together on camera all these years.

The performances are definitely helped by the excellent source material. Deathly Hallows is an amazing final installment, make no mistake, and Yates runs with it. From the flying motorcycle chase to the infiltration of the Ministry of Magic to Harry and Hermione's visit to Godric's Hollow (my favorite scene in the entire book series), this movie is packed full of memorable scenes.

The Ministry of Magic scene deserves a special mention. In it, Harry, Ron and Hermione transform into Ministry employees using Polyjuice Potion. The employees, played by David O'Hara, Steffan Rhodri and Sophie Thompson, obviously don't look like the three lead actors, but their performances are hilariously similar. I'd love to ask Yates how he approached this scene; I wouldn't be surprised if some meticulous character workshops were involved. O'Hara, who many will recognize from his roles in The Departed and Wanted, is particularly funny in his interpretation of Radcliffe's walk and physical mannerisms.

That said, we spend a lot of time in the woods in this movie. This was perhaps the biggest complaint fans of the book had upon its release, and it remains here. Yates and crew do their best to switch it up a bit; they change locations and scenery several times, but it still feels like an inordinate amount of time spent wandering the forest.

Aside from that, there isn't much at all to complain about. The leads are wonderful in their roles, as is the supporting cast. The action is filmed perfectly, and the special effects are the best in the series. We've come a long way since Sorcerer's Stone.

It was really disappointing to see Deathly Hallows: Part 1 end. They picked a decent point to leave off, but waiting until July will be excruciating. I still hate the decision to split the seventh installment into two films, but there is a silver lining to that dark cloud: if we can have two movies that are this good instead of just one, then I won't argue. Part 1 receives my highest recommendation. Bring on Part 2.

4.5 stars out of 5